theDigitalNews.TV

Stats. Metrics. Articles. Resources. Trends. For Digital Media.

Archive for March 13th, 2008

Mobile Advertising Reaches for the Sky

Posted by Mort Greenberg on March 13, 2008

Source: http://wirelessweek.com
By Brad Smith
WirelessWeek – August 15, 2007

There’s a lot of uncertainty about the specifics, but nearly everyone thinks
the mobile world is a good one for some kind of advertising.

Mobile advertising seems to be an industry that’s about ready to explode, chasing the billions already being spent on Internet advertising. But mobility, although it has unmatched attractions for advertisers, also is a business very much in a state of flux.

Some of those in the burgeoning mobile advertising industry, which has been making money mostly through text-driven ads, expect advances in networks and advertising capabilities to reach an inflexion point in time for the Christmas shopping season. If so, mobile advertising could become a tiger escaping from its cage next year.

   Global Mobile Ad Spend Forecast for 2011
Global Mobile Ad Spend
Source: Strategy Analytics

What has everyone so excited about mobile advertising is what has happened on the Internet. Ad spending on the Web is growing at a compound annual rate of 18.3% and will reach $73 billion in 2011, according to PriceWaterhouseCoopers. The consultancy says Internet advertising will comprise 14% of the entire global advertising market by that year.

Another research company, eMarketer, expects Internet ad spending in the United States to total $19.5 billion this year Nielsen NetRatings says the top 10 Internet advertisers in the United States spent $278.4 million in June alone, led by InterActive Corporation’s $47.2 million. Those numbers exclude search advertising, which is the fastest-growing segment of Internet advertising.

If mobile advertising follows that spending curve, it’s no wonder the industry sees big things ahead. Strategy Analytics is forecasting advertisers will spend $1.4 billion on mobile media this year, with that rising to $14.4 billion in 2011. eMarketer says mobile ad spending reached $1.5 billion last year and will grow to $14 by 2011.

“The outlook for mobile advertising spend has significantly advanced in the past 12 months,” says Phil Taylor, director of Strategy Analytic’s global wireless practice. “The supply of advertising inventory is rapidly increasing as mobile publishers look to develop advertising as a revenue stream.”

Taylor notes that Sprint Nextel, Verizon Wireless and Vodafone have all accelerated their plans to sell advertising through their networks. “Advertisers appear to be responding positively,” he says.

Association Enables Mobile Ad Industry
Mobile advertising and marketing has gone beyond the experimentation stage by brands, which now see it as a viable option for the promotional dollars, says Laura Marriott, executive director of the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA).

Laura Marriott
Marriott: Mobile is
not the same as
the Internet.

Marriott says an ecosystem is being developed through the MMA that includes brands, agencies, aggregators and wireless carriers. The operators have played a key role in helping the association develop guidelines for advertising on their networks, she says.

Carriers also are starting to take steps to make it possible for advertisers to target particular demographic categories. Sprint was the first, providing information like sex, age and the ZIP code of subscribers on a controlled basis. Verizon Wireless and AT&T are on a similar track.

The biggest challenge for mobile advertising now is educating the ecosystem that mobile is not the same as the Internet, Marriott says, adding that he consumer also has to be educated about the advanced functionality of phones and networks.

The MMA has put together several guidelines and policies for its 400+ members to follow, as well as collaborations with industry groups. Included is its best practices guidelines, which it originally developed in 2005 and recently updated. The update defined guidelines for marketing to children under the age of 13, for opt-in and opt-out through interactive voice response, and for secure opt-ins on the mobile Web.

The association also has established a committee to work on measurements for mobile advertising. The committee hopes to develop a framework to measure mobile marketing campaigns across all channels, including mobile video, TV, multimedia services and more, the MMA says.

The MMA also has established recent relationships with the GSM Association and the dotMobi Advisory Group. The GSMA and MMA said they will cooperate on the development of mobile advertising globally through standardization efforts and developing mobile advertising techniques. The MMA and dotMobi Advisory Group, which works with the mobile Web domain registry mTLD Top Level Domain Ltd., plan to develop a common set of guidelines and best practices for the mobile Internet.

And then there’s the interest that Google, which lives on its Internet ad revenue, has shown in mobile advertising. Google CEO Eric Schmidt said at the All Things Digital conference in May that the company wants its share of mobile ad revenue because “they are twice as profitable or more than the non-mobile phone ads because they’re more personal.” Carriers have expressed some concern about Google’s entry, fearing they could lose ad revenue.

Despite these rosy expectations, there still is some caution evident because mobile advertising in a unique and unknown medium is bringing together carriers, ad agencies, publishers, mobile ad technology companies and brands. Everyone is treading on unfamiliar ground.

The No. 1 issue facing mobile advertising, says Kanishka Agarwal, vice president of mobile media for Telephia, is that the mobile industry is not a single advertising medium. Brands and advertisers are familiar with working with print, TV, radio and the Internet as separate entities. But mobile networks can bring together the Internet, video, text, gaming, music and more.

“Mobile is a group of quite separate media with different characteristics,” Agarwal says. “They differ in form and in the audiences they draw. People are still trying to figure out a way to handle this.”

One of those figuring it out is John Hadl, CEO of Brand in Hand and strategic adviser to Proctor & Gamble on its mobile strategy. Hadl created more than 50 mobile advertising campaigns in 2006, including Cover Girl and Old Spice.

Hadl says the top priority for advertisers is that they want to buy audiences and not technology. “Brands are about reaching consumers and audiences,” he says, adding that technology is not interesting to advertisers.

“The problem is that mobile companies are mostly selling tools now,” he says. “We’re all being sold platforms and technology. You have to give us an audience.”

Hadl also thinks mobile advertising will become more interesting to major brands when richer content on wireless devices becomes more widespread, especially video and TV. The richer the media, the richer the consumer experience, which drives sales and brand recognition.

As long as everyone in the mobile advertising business remembers that the “consumer is boss,” Hadl says, he is optimistic about the future. Everyone involved is trying different things to see how they work, getting their feedback from consumer reactions.

Another agency working in the mobile arena is Nurun/ant farm interactive. Michael Koziol, executive vice president, says mobile advertising is much more complex than online advertising was in the 1990s. Part of that is because wireless operators are taking a stronger position on collecting a share than did the wired telcos.

“It’s not unreasonable that they are more involved,” he says of the carriers. “It doesn’t make it as profitable for content properties where the ISP didn’t ask for a share. AOL did, but where are they now?”

There also is a great deal of uncertainty because no one in the value chain knows exactly what will work or how to price it. “Everybody is doing different things and no one is moving in the same direction,” he says. “In the 1990s, most things were moving in the same direction at least.”

Nurun has done some mobile advertising, some of which has worked well and some that hasn’t. Koziol believes the future of mobile will be less in advertising and more in building brand affinity by connecting with individuals with information in context.

“Phones are personal space, which makes them appealing for marketers but is dangerous ground for push advertising,” he says, adding that delivering ads to phones should be on-demand or at the point of need.

Some major brands have started moving into mobile advertising. Among them are Proctor & Gamble, CBS and Coca-Cola. CBS recently inked a deal with four mobile advertising companies, AdMob, Millennial Media, Rhythm NewMedia and Third Screen Media. Third Screen also has a deal with Fox TV.

Cyriac Roeding, executive vice president of CBS Mobile, says each of the four will provide different technologies and services for CBS content, including banner and text ads on WAP sites, phones and video commercials attached to video content.

Sprite’s The Yard...
Sprite’s The Yard campaign
lets friends share content.

Coca-Cola’s Sprite brand this summer launched a WAP-based mobile community service in the United States aimed specifically at teenagers. The service, called The Yard, allows users to create a network of friends who can share photos and messages, as well as get content like mobile phone wallpapers, games and video mobisodes content. The design of the application and the content is specifically aimed at teenagers because they are a key market for Sprite, according to Mark Greatrex, senior vice president for marketing communications for Coca-Cola.

Teenagers are a particularly difficult segment to reach with a marketing campaign, Greatrex said, so Coca-Cola decided to reach them where they are – on their mobile phones. Sprite is using short codes and PINs found on the caps of Sprite bottles to drive users to The Yard.

Coca-Cola is working with all the U.S. carriers, but all that any user needs is a WAP-enabled phone and a data plan. Teenagers can text the word Yard to the short code 59666 to get a WAP link to the site. They then set up their tag name and password and invite others to join their network.

Paul Palmieri, president and CEO of Millennial Media and former executive at Verizon Wireless, says one of the reasons carriers and content owners are becoming more interested in advertising is that downloads by wireless subscribers has started to slow and they’re looking for new ways to support downloads as well as boost revenue.

Research by M:Metrics confirms Palmieri’s assertion. The research company says the number of downloads over wireless networks in the United States has risen slowly from 38.7 million in January to 40.8 million in May and has been on only a slight uphill trend over the last year.

“There is going to have to be a leap of faith on the publisher side as some the subscription-based content moves into an ad-supported model,” Palmieri says. “That could take some time but we think it will happen. If you have a subscription download model and it slows, it will be less of a leap of faith.”

Palmieri says Millennial Media’s business based on premium CPM (cost per thousand impressions) has been “growing really nicely.” The other principle way of charging for mobile advertising is based on a click-through rate, similar to the Internet.

Millennial operates ad-serving technology as well as marketplaces where publishers and advertisers can buy and sell ads. It’s newest marketplace, Decktrade, is a performance-based self-service auction platform that Palmieri says has provided “quite a significant percentage” of the company’s revenue since it launched in March.

Palmieri says one of the keys to the future of mobile advertising will be the creation of experience-based content, such as a WAP site for an artist’s fan club. The fan can see pictures, check tour dates and perhaps buy something. That transition to rich, interactive content is starting to take place, he says.

“We’re in a shift now,” Palmieri says. “There is a resurgence of WAP and an emergence over the last six months of more experience-based content.”

Palmieri also sees growing interest on the part of advertisers and brands to use mobile channels, while there hasn’t been a similar uptick in the amount of ad inventory being created.

Coming from the carrier world, it might not be surprising that Palmieri thinks operators should be able to charge a premium for allowing ads to run over their networks. Carriers reportedly are charging rates as much as 10 times higher than Internet rates, but Palmieri says that may be justified.

“This is the most personal device that people own,” he says. “It is the most personal place you can reach a consumer. That really is something special and something premium and it ought to treated as such. The notion that the price is 10 times the Internet is well-deserved.”

Ari Paparo, vice president of rich media for the Internet ad company Doubleclick, thinks mobile advertising rates will come down as the industry matures and advertising inventory rises.

Jeff Janer, CMO for Third Screen Media, says his company actually has seen an increase in brands and mobile sites seeking to advertise. He says the supply of advertising has picked up but that it is not well-targeted.

Third Screen recently teamed with Telephia to provide third-party measurement of mobile Internet usage, something advertisers want to know. But carriers also hold another key to measuring how effective an ad campaign is because they know who their subscribers are. Carriers are understandably reluctant to invade their subscribers’ privacy but could make demographic information available on an opt-in basis.

“Advertisers want a third-party validation,” Janer says. “The real money is not going to start flowing until third parties are engaged.”

Third Screen recently was acquired by AOL subsidiary Advertising.com, which Janer says has greatly expanded its reach. Telephia says Third Screen has the ability of reaching half of all U.S. mobile content subscribers, with twice the number of mobile ad campaigns as it had a year earlier.

Text-driven mobile advertising has been the main driver in the industry until now, says Telephia’s Agarwal, but he says ads on the mobile Internet are picking up and the next frontier will be mobile video. SMS, used by 150 million Americans, is a mass market but WAP and video are not, he says. However advertising could make those mass-market media because ads can lower or eliminate the end-user costs.

“Text will be predominant for several years because everyone has a phone that can use it,” he says. “The phone is second only to your underwear for what you have with you all the time. And SMS is the biggest mass-market way to reach that. Advertisers and marketers buy audiences and SMS delivers that audience now.”

Mobile Ads Span Text to WAP
Text-based campaigns and WAP sites have become the two main avenues for brands to reach mobile subscribers.One of the companies involved in text-based advertising is qtags, a Houston-based mobile marketing company that uses short codes to provide mobile interactive content, including promotions and coupons. Its clients include Accenture, NAS Recruitment, Fidelity Investments, Toyota, Verizon Wireless, American Express, CITI and Hewlett Packard.

“Our goal,” says founder Allison Gower, “is to help the consumer control their advertising.” Qtags connects consumers and brands off-line and online, Gower says, by making content interactive via SMS. An example is texting a keyword like “Verizon” to qtags’ shortcode, 78247, and the user gets information about jobs available at Verizon Wireless. The texts are saved online. Many of the current campaigns are job recruitment related.

The service can help brand names build communities of consumers who have an interest in their products, Gower says. The overall service is free of advertising although community sites might have sponsored sites.

Mobile provides context of time and place, she says. When someone enters a store and sees a promotion, a consumer can text to get specials listed on their phone.

The Internet auto shopping site, Cars.com, launched a mobile channel this summer, with Lexus as its first sponsor. The sponsorship links users to the Lexus WAP site for dealer information, while the general Cars.com mobile site includes its inventory of 2 million new and used vehicles, including Kelley Blue Book values.

Sharon Knitter
Knitter: More
WAP sites coming.

Since its launch, Honda also has started sponsoring the site and Hyundai will join soon, according to Sharon Knitter, product management director. When Cars.com started working on the service earlier this year, not many manufacturers had WAP sites, but more are building them, she says.

The WAP site for Cars.com allows mobile consumers to research and find cars or dealers, as well as click on a dealer to make a voice call. The site and service was built using Crisp Wireless technology. Crisp hosts the site.

Air2Web has developed mobile marketing programs for such companies as The Weather Channel and UPS. CMO Bill Jones says Air2Web helps its customers track not only how many people have visited their WAP sites, but also who the visitors are because log-in information is collected.

This kind of user information makes it possible for brands to build loyalty among consumers, Jones says, and also can be used for local search so geographic information is collected.

“You can determine how you did with different demographics and then decide how you can change things to make your campaign better,” he says.

Another mobile marketing company is go2, which owns and operates more than 350 mobile Websites for its carrier-centric go2 Mobile Content Network. The company says it has delivered more than 1 billion WAP page views for local search information and content since it launched in 2001. More than 335 of its sites are dedicated to specific colleges and universities.

Lee Hancock, founder and CEO, says advertising is coming of age on WAP sites because mobile “is a very high-touch, high-value advertising medium.”

In addition to its WAP sites, go2 also runs a polling system which asks site visitors to answer a question of the day. The system, called Speedpoll, generated 1 million responses in its first nine months.

The company’s research of its users determined that the overwhelming majority of wireless subscribers, in the 80% to 90% range, are willing to accept advertising on their phones if they can get content for free, Hancock says.

Posted in Mobile | Leave a Comment »

When New Media Becomes Old Hat

Posted by Mort Greenberg on March 13, 2008

Source: http://emarketer.com

MARCH 13, 2008

Why the need for fresh data will never go away.

Marketers always want to know if a new tactic, channel or consumer behavior is The Next Big Thing. For a shot at the answer, they rely on market data and analyst projections.

But what happens once The Next Big Thing is an established hit?

For instance, three-quarters of Internet users now use online video. With usage so high, will the behavior become a given, making estimates of online video usage less relevant and valuable?

eMarketer CEO Geoff Ramsey and some senior analysts give their perspective below.

David Hallerman

With online video, it’s not so much a question of who has watched video, but the questions that follow: How many videos did each person watch on average? How much time did each person spend watching videos?

Even with the most saturated types of technology and usage, there are questions that are not clearly answered by the mere fact of great market penetration.

Karin von Abrams

Many of today’s emerging consumer behaviors will become “wallpaper” activities in the future, when they are no longer remotely novel. So people may leave a video playing, just as they leave the TV on now for hours at a time.

In these circumstances, a single percentage point in the viewer audience may not mean much.

Jeffrey Grau

One implication of a maturing market is a shift from customer acquisition to customer retention.

In retail e-commerce this means paying more attention to customer satisfaction by improving Web site usability and customer service, and bulking up customer loyalty programs and other retention tactics.

Keep in mind that in a big market growth rates can slow down, but the sheer volume of new customers can still be very high.

Lisa Phillips

The majority of consumers now use the Internet to learn about specific health conditions or fuel efficiency in various models of cars.

As a result, marketers in the healthcare and automotive industries are asking more targeted questions. The idea is to ask new questions, to divine the best ways to reach and capture the attention of Internet users.

For instance, consumers may watch videos online, but do they watch them for entertainment, information or both?

Geoff Ramsey

Sure, 75% of Internet users watch videos.

But they spend about 3 hours on average watching them per week. Compare that with television, which the average American watches 4.34 hours per day.

Saturation is relative.

John du Pre Gauntt

In the early days of a new channel or behavior, you go for raw reach because it isn’t there. At that point, volume attracts marketers following eyeballs.

Post-saturation, the game flips to relevance and targeting.

The more important questions become things like “What is our penetration of college-educated, 18-to-34-year-old professional, extreme sports-loving, DMA-dwelling eyeballs?” and “What are they watching, how often and bundled with what?”

Those are profit-related questions. How many bodies are out there watching is a revenue-related question.

Getting the timing, assets, skills and investments right when the flip occurs are the marketer’s challenge.

Ben Macklin

The value of certain statistics does decline with saturation; broadband and Internet users are obvious examples.

The relevant questions now are: “How are different people using the Internet? and “How is that changing and affecting traditional media usage and the way people live their lives?”

Eventually bandwidth will flow like water (with some countries experiencing drought conditions) and then it will just be usage that is interesting rather than access.

Debra Aho Williamson

Let’s not forget that some Internet activities that appear to be approaching saturation may not in fact ever reach saturation. They could lose favor and decline.

So it makes sense to keep watching the usage levels and understand whether something is rising, peaking or declining.

The eMarketer US Online Ad Targeting report will be published in May. Click here to be notified when it is released.  

Posted in Consumer Behavior, Marketplace Trends, Online Video News, eMarketer | Leave a Comment »

All about email open rates

Posted by Mort Greenberg on March 13, 2008

Source: http://www.campaignmonitor.com/

by Mathew Patterson on January 22, 2007

Our customers often ask us what ‘open rate’ means, and whether the open rate they are getting is any good or not. We’ve put together the following guide to open rates, which you will now also find in the help section of your account.

What is an open rate?

Open rate is a measure of how many people on an email list open (or view) a particular email campaign. The open rate is normally expressed as a percentage, and at Campaign Monitor we calculate it as follows:

Total emails opened divided by total emails delivered (i.e excluding any bounces)

So a 20% open rate would mean that of every 10 emails delivered to the inbox, 2 were actually opened.

How do you measure an open?

When each email is sent out, we automatically add a piece of code that requests a tiny, invisible image from our web servers. So when a reader opens the email, the image is downloaded, and we can record that download as an open for that specific email.

It is important to understand that the open rate is not a 100% accurate measure. Recording an ‘open’ can only happen if the readers email client is capable of displaying html with images, and that option is turned on. So if you are sending text-only emails, there is no way to record open rates (the exception is if they actually click a link). Similarly, people reading your html email without images showing will not be recorded as opens.

Another issue is that your readers may have a preview pane in their email client. That preview pane might be displaying your email automatically (and therefore downloading the images) without the reader ever having to click on it or read it.

So you should never take your open rate as a hard and fast number, because you can never know the true figure. It is much better used as general guide, and as a way of measuring the trends on your email campaigns.

What is a typical open rate?

Really, there is no typical open rate. The rate obtained for any list, or group of lists will depend on how it was measured, when it was sent, the size of the list and a zillion other potential variables. There is no shortage of benchmark numbers out there, but even between benchmark figures you will find big variation in the reported open rates.

So instead of giving a specific percentage, we’ve come up with the following chart.

Simple chart showing that most industries have average open rates between 20% and 40%

There are certainly some broad trends in open rates.

  • As list size goes up, the open rate tends to fall; possibly because smaller companies are more likely to have personal relationships with their list subscribers.
  • Companies and organizations that are focusing on enthusiasts and supporters, like churches, sport teams and non profits see higher open rates
  • More specific niche topics, like some manufacturing areas also typically have higher open rates than emails on broader topics

Why don’t you just give me a number!

So what if you or your clients just have no idea of what is a reasonable open rate? Based on everything we have seen here at Campaign Monitor, and on the other research out there, the bottom line is this:

If you are getting an open rate between 20% and 40%, you are probably somewhere around average.

Very few lists of reasonable size are getting much above 50% open rates from normal campaigns. Your list may have some specific factors that give you higher rates; if so, well done.

However, don’t expect to be getting 80% open rates. People are too busy, inboxes are too full and the measurements are technically limited. If, after all that, you are still interested in seeing specific figures, see the footer for some references you can browse through.

How can I increase my open rate?

There are a ton of elements you can vary to try to entice more of your subscribers to open up your emails. Here are just a few things you could try:

  • Experiment with your subject lines: Try including details about the content of the email right in the subject line, instead of using your standard subject.
  • Send on a different day: Are your subscribers too busy on a Wednesday morning to read your email, leaving it languishing down the inbox? Maybe a Friday afternoon email would be welcomed.
  • Get the important content up the top: Remember that many people will see a preview of your email before deciding to open it or ignore it. Make sure your email is recognizable, and that your key points are in the top third.

References:

The typical open rates in the chart above were derived from Campaign Monitor’s own figures, in conjunction with numbers published by Mailchimp, Bronto and Mailer Mailer.

Posted in Direct Response/Email | 1 Comment »

Hollywood Test Tolerance for Ads with Online Video

Posted by Mort Greenberg on March 13, 2008

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com 

 By Kim Hart and Mike Musgrove

Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, March 12, 2008; Page D01

Watching video online has typically entailed viewing short snippets of celebrity news, music videos and homemade clips. But as streaming video becomes more popular, Hollywood is trying to figure out how to make its old business translate better online.

Hulu, a joint venture of NBC Universal and Fox, debuts on the Web today with a large library of advertising-supported television shows, movies and other video.

Hulu requires viewers to sit through two minutes of advertisements for a typical half-hour episode, or roughly 75 percent less commercial time than the typical prime-time TV show. Users of digital video recorders can skip commercials, but there’s no fast-forwarding through Hulu.

Hulu, like other online video companies, is testing viewers’ tolerance for ads. Having gained a following among about 5 million users during its test phase, Hulu plans its broader launch today. It is also planning to announce deals with Warner Bros. Television Group and Lionsgate to make popular shows like “Dawson’s Creek” and movies like “Terminator 2″ available on the site.

Hulu’s library doesn’t cover everything. ABC and CBS, for example, are not part of its roster of about 50 studios and networks. But Hulu chief executive Jason Kilar said the company has quadrupled the number of titles in its catalog since starting private testing in October.

The early popularity of Hulu and the growing audiences for other premium video content suggests that online viewers are interested in watching more than just the amateur videos that catapulted YouTube to success, said David Hallerman, senior analyst at eMarketer, a market-research firm.

Advertisers may be more willing to associate their brands with professional content, rather than user-generated videos that might be considered off-color or inappropriate, he said.

“A trusted environment would draw more of this money,” Hallerman said. He noted that YouTube has struggled to translate its popularity in advertising revenue.

Jayant Kadambi, chief executive of YuMe, a Redwood, Calif.-based advertising network that lets publishers pair ads with videos, said tolerance for advertising is low for the amateur snippets.

“With user-generated content, people don’t want to see the ads,” he said. “But if you’re desperate to watch something specific you’ll put up with more ads to see it.”

Nissan is working with Hulu, sponsoring such shows as NBC’s “Heroes.”

Robert D’Asaro, U.S. director of digital strategic alliances at ad agency OMD, said his company’s studies have shown that Hulu users tend to be more engaged with what’s on the screen than the average television viewer, in part because they usually sit closer to the screen and have fewer distractions. As a result, he said, users tend to come away from watching Hulu with more of an impression of the commercials than do television viewers.

“It’s the two-foot experience as opposed to the 10-foot experience,” he said.

Melissa Adams, senior manager of Nissan North America‘s media and brand integration, said the company’s marketing is simply following the viewers.

“There’s been so much fragmentation in media consumption,” she said. “We have to go where consumers are going.”

Kilar, who worked at Amazon.com for nine years, took over Hulu a year ago with the goal of hosting all the premium content on the Web.

Hulu’s advertising strategy is to be both targeted and minimal. Each show has a single sponsor. It is experimenting with allowing users to choose which ads to view, and with showing movie trailers upfront in exchange for shows without commercial breaks. But unlike other sites — such as NBC and Fox’s independent sites — it doesn’t try to keep users captive; if users search for television shows or movies that aren’t available on Hulu, they are directed to other sites. Users can also embed snippets of content from Hulu in their blogs or online profiles.

Allowing users to chose ads is innovative, some analysts said.

“It’s one of the more aggressive moves we’ve seen,” said Bobby Tulsiani, an analyst with Jupiter Research. “It’s much more targeted than what you see on TV, where its hard to say if an ad actually got watched.”

While Hulu keeps track of what users watch, it does not yet target ads based on their TV-viewing preferences. But the company said it is investing in more sophisticated technology to target ads based on viewers’ habits.

Hulu has plenty of company among start-ups eager to make video advertising more lucrative and targeted.

YouTube has partnerships with about 1,000 premium content producers, including National Geographic, CBS and Sundance, but videos are no longer than 10 minutes. In August, YouTube started superimposing transparent ads at the bottom of videos that appear for only 10 seconds, which the site said turns fewer viewers away than 30-second ads before videos start.

Video-search company Blinkx embeds ads that are relevant to a video’s content. Using voice-recognition software, Blinkx shows ads related to keywords mentioned in videos. Most of Blinkx’s users also prefer professional content over amateur video, according to chief executive Suranga Chandratillake.

Posted in Brand Advertising, Online Video News, UGC | Leave a Comment »

Testing Over, Hulu.com to Open Its TV and Film Offerings This Week

Posted by Mort Greenberg on March 13, 2008

Source: http://nytimes.com

March 11, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO — Hulu.com, the long-gestating Internet joint venture between NBC Universal and Fox, emerges from limited testing on Wednesday to make its catalog of TV shows and video clips available to anyone on the Web.

The streaming-video site displays free, ad-supported shows and feature films from NBC, Fox and more than 50 media companies, including Sony Pictures and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

On Wednesday, Hulu is also planning to announce that the Warner Brothers Television Group and Lionsgate will add content from their libraries. Hulu will also give sports fans highlights from N.B.A. and N.H.L. games, and full-length N.C.A.A. men’s basketball games from the last 25 years, the company said.

Hulu’s videos also appear on AOL, MSN, Comcast, MySpace and Yahoo. Over 5,000 Web sites have embedded clips from Hulu, the company said.

Hulu has so far failed to recruit two major television networks, ABC, a division of Walt Disney, and CBS. Jason Kilar, Hulu’s chief executive, said that he was still having regular conversations with executives at the two networks. But even without them, he said, the company has quadrupled the number of show titles in its library since testing began.

“We won’t stop until we have everything in terms of premium content. That is our mission,” he said. “I just think back to the fact that 24 months ago, there wasn’t anything online legally in terms of full TV episodes or films. In just 17 weeks, we have gone from nothing to over 200 premium titles.”

NBC Universal, a division of General Electric, and Fox, a division of the News Corporation, announced their joint venture to much fanfare nearly a year ago. The then-unnamed company was at first viewed skeptically by many in the industry as a desperate attempt to keep up with the Google’s YouTube, the dominant player in online video.

Recently, Hulu has received high marks from media and Web executives for creating an easy to use site with high-quality video and professional content attractive to advertisers.

Hulu has been in a password-protected testing period since October, but has slowly been inviting users to enter the site. Mr. Kilar said that more than five million viewers have watched Hulu videos in the last 30 days, and that 80 percent of the shows on the site are viewed at least once a week.

Hulu is experimenting with giving viewers a choice in advertising. During certain shows, viewers will be able to choose which commercial they want to watch — for example, whether they want to see an ad for Nissan’s Rogue S.U.V., Maxima sedan or Z sports car.

Some viewers will also be given the opportunity to watch a two-minute film preview before a TV show, and then skip all the other advertising breaks.

One challenge Hulu faces is building a predictable and stable library of content. To protect DVD and Web download sales, media companies often make TV shows and films available free on the Web for certain periods of time and then remove them. For example, there are 11 episodes of the TV show “24” on Hulu — beginning with episode 18 of the first season.

“If those episodes keep disappearing, they are going to have trouble getting people to go back and recommend TV shows on Hulu to their friends,” said Bobby Tulsiani, an analyst at JupiterResearch.

Posted in Television & Video | Leave a Comment »

Video Road Hogs Stir Fear of Internet Traffic Jam

Posted by Mort Greenberg on March 13, 2008

Source: http://www.nytimes.com

By STEVE LOHR

Published: March 13, 2008
Caution: Heavy Internet traffic ahead. Delays possible.

Multimedia

Busier and Busier

Busier and Busier

 Back Story With Steve Lohr (mp3)

For months there has been a rising chorus of alarm about the surging growth in the amount of data flying across the Internet. The threat, according to some industry groups, analysts and researchers, stems mainly from the increasing visual richness of online communications and entertainment — video clips and movies, social networks and multiplayer games.

Moving images, far more than words or sounds, are hefty rivers of digital bits as they traverse the Internet’s pipes and gateways, requiring, in industry parlance, more bandwidth. Last year, by one estimate, the video site YouTube, owned by Google, consumed as much bandwidth as the entire Internet did in 2000.

In a widely cited report published last November, a research firm projected that user demand for the Internet could outpace network capacity by 2011. The title of a debate scheduled next month at a technology conference in Boston sums up the angst: “The End of the Internet?”

But the Internet traffic surge represents more a looming challenge than an impending catastrophe. Even those most concerned are not predicting a lights-out Internet crash. An individual user, they say, would experience Internet clogging in the form of sluggish download speeds and frustration with data-heavy services that become much less useful or enjoyable.

“The Internet doesn’t collapse, but there would be a growing class of stuff you just can’t do online,” said Johna Till Johnson, president of Nemertes Research, which predicted the bandwidth squeeze by 2011, anticipating that demand will grow by 100 percent or more a year.

Others are less worried — at least in the short term. Andrew M. Odlyzko, a professor at the University of Minnesota, estimates that digital traffic on the global network is growing about 50 percent a year, in line with a recent analysis by Cisco Systems, the big network equipment maker.

That sounds like a daunting rate of growth. Yet the technology for handling Internet traffic is advancing at an impressive pace as well. The router computers for relaying data get faster, fiber optic transmission gets better and software for juggling data packets gets smarter.

“The 50 percent growth is high. It’s huge, but it basically corresponds to the improvements that technology is giving us,” said Professor Odlyzko, a former AT&T Labs researcher. Demand is not likely to overwhelm the Internet, he said.

The question of the problem’s severity is more than a technical one, since it will affect the shape and cost of the nation’s policy on broadband infrastructure, a matter that is expected to attract political attention after a new administration takes over in Washington.

While experts debate the immediacy of the challenge, they agree that it points to a larger issue. In the Internet era, they say, high-speed networks are increasingly the economic and scientific petri dishes of innovation, spawning new businesses, markets and jobs. If American investment lags behind, they warn, the nation risks losing competitiveness to countries that are making the move to higher-speed Internet access a priority.

“The long-term issue is where innovation happens,” Professor Odlyzko said. “Where will the next Google, YouTube, eBay or Amazon come from?”

The Internet, though a global network, is in many ways surprisingly local. It is a vast amalgam of smaller networks, all linked together. The worries about digital traffic congestion are not really about the Internet’s main trunk lines, the equivalent of network superhighways. Instead, the problem is close to home — the capacity of neighborhood switches, routers and pipes into a house. The cost of stringing high-speed optical fiber to a home, analysts estimate, can be $1,000 or more.

That is why Internet access speeds vary so much country by country. They depend on local patterns of corporate investment and government subsidy. Frederick J. Baker, a research fellow at Cisco, was attending a professional conference last month in Taiwan where Internet access is more than twice as fast and costs far less than his premium “high speed” service in California.

“When I mention my own service, people here shake their heads in disbelief,” said Mr. Baker, who is a board member of the Internet Society, a nonprofit organization that helps guide Internet standards and policy.

In the United States, the investment required to cope with rising Internet traffic will need to be made at several levels, not just cable and telecommunications carriers. Tim Pozar, an engineer and a co-owner of the Internet services company UnitedLayer in San Francisco, said a number of forces were combining: the surge in bandwidth-hungry video applications on Web sites, the need to handle traffic from more Internet-enabled devices like cellphones, and shortages of electrical power for data centers in places like San Francisco.

“We’re running out of horsepower to accommodate the demand,” said Mr. Pozar, whose company’s data centers support Web sites for customers ranging from museums to social networks. “And upgrades needed in data centers are going to be a lot more expensive than in the past, now that all the excess capacity left over after the dot-com bubble burst has been gobbled up.” The pace of future demand is the big uncertainty surrounding the Internet traffic challenge, and how fast people will adopt emerging technologies is notoriously difficult to foresee.

In the aftermath of the bursting of the technology bubble in 2000, there was a glut of capacity — so-called dark fiber, strung around the world and then left dormant. Now demand is catching up with that supply. In its prediction of more than 100 percent annual growth, Nemertes, a telecommunications research firm, assumes brisk use of new innovations like high-end videoconferencing, known as telepresence, which corporations are beginning to embrace as an alternative to costly, time-consuming travel.

If this technology becomes a consumer product in the next few years, as some analysts predict, Internet traffic could spike even more sharply.

Slick video chats are something that William Bentley, a 13-year-old New Yorker, would like to see. He is fairly representative of the next generation of digital consumer: He has made and posted his own YouTube videos, subscribes to YouTube channels, enjoys multiplayer games like World of Warcraft and Unreal Tournament, and downloads music and videos.

Asked what he would want next from the Internet, he replied, “It would be nice to have everybody always right there — just click and you could see them clearly and talk to them.”

That sort of service is certainly going to require more bandwidth and more investment, with higher costs across the spectrum of the Internet ecosystem that includes cable and telecommunications carriers, Internet companies, media Web sites and even consumers. AT&T, for one, said last week that it would spend $1 billion this year — double its 2006 expenditures — to expand its overseas infrastructure.

But even if investment lags behind, there will be no Internet blackout. Indeed, the Internet has survived predictions of collapse in the past, most notably by Robert M. Metcalfe, a networking pioneer and entrepreneur, who in a 1995 magazine column warned of a “catastrophic collapse” of the Internet in 1996. There were service problems, but nothing like Mr. Metcalfe predicted, and on stage at a conference in 1997 he ate his words.

“The Internet has proven to be wonderfully resilient,” said Mr. Metcalfe, who is now a venture capitalist. “But the Internet is vulnerable today. It’s not that it will collapse, but that opportunities will be lost.”

Posted in Marketplace Trends | Leave a Comment »

Toyota Turns Up the Heat in Online Battle With Chevrolet

Posted by Mort Greenberg on March 13, 2008

Source: http://seekingalpha.com/

posted on: March 13, 2008 | about stocks: F / GM / NSANY / TM / VOLVY.PK    

Toyota (TM) is closing on General Motors’ (GM) Chevrolet as the top brand in the U.S. automotive market. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Ad/Behaviroral Targeting, Brand Advertising, Consumer Behavior, Marketplace Trends | Leave a Comment »

YouTube APIs Coming to a Site Near You

Posted by Mort Greenberg on March 13, 2008

Source: http://www.internetnews.com/

Back to Article

By Kenneth Corbin
March 12, 2008
Google’s YouTube, one of the jewels of the participatory Web, just got a lot more open.

The world’s most popular video site announced today that it is offering new application program interfaces, or APIs , that will enable developers to access the YouTube database and embed video content on their sites. “For partners and developers, YouTube has grown into much more than a Web site,” YouTube product manager Jim Patterson wrote in a company blog. “It has become an open, general-purpose video services platform, available for use by just about any third-party Web site, desktop application or consumer device.”

The announcement builds significantly on YouTube’s previous APIs, which allowed users to search the database and upload select videos onto their sites. By offering its technology and entire video content to other Web sites, YouTube is now positioning itself more as a video-serving platform than merely a destination for people to come and watch content.

The move comes as Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) has been moving aggressively to monetize video content by broadening the YouTube partners program and expanding its AdSense program to include video placements.

Now, YouTube’s ad-enabled videos will find a wider audience as more developers begin integrating them into their sites.

In addition, users will have access to the complete YouTube library, with a full set of create, retrieve, update, delete (CRUD) persistent storage capabilities available to manage the content.

In opening access to its database functions, YouTube is giving third-party sites the opportunity to tap its streaming and hosting services to reach its considerable global audience.

The new APIs will enable developers to create “chromeless” Flash players with a customizable interface built on YouTube software, but without the YouTube branding. Instead, YouTube is asking developers to place a “Powered by YouTube” button on the pages of their sites that contain the API-enabled video players.

Developers will be able to upload videos and responses to YouTube from any device, including cell phones and other handhelds. The APIs will also allow developers to augment the video content on their sites with metadata, such as titles, descriptions, ratings and comments.

YouTube is enabling third-party sites to retrieve feeds set to the specifications of 18 international locales. With this feature, developers could create feeds that regularly fetch the top-rated or most-viewed content on YouTube from a particular corner of the world where their audience might be concentrated.

Among the early adopters of YouTube’s APIs is TiVo, which is integrating content from the site into its DVR service so that people can watch, rate and share YouTube videos on their television sets.

Meanwhile, the University of California, Berkeley, is using the upload API to publish lectures and other video course material to YouTube, and video game publisher Electronic Arts allows players to post and share videos on the site incorporating characters they’ve created in its forthcoming game Spore.

Posted in Online Video News, UGC | Leave a Comment »